it maximizes $\log \, p_\theta(x_n)$ and brings $q_\alpha(z \mid
x_n)$ close to $p_\theta(z \mid x_n)$.
+\medskip
+
+A point that may be important in practice is
+%
+\begin{align*}
+ & \expect_{Z \sim q_\alpha(z \mid x_n)} \left[ \log \frac{p_\theta(x_n,Z)}{q_\alpha(Z \mid x_n)} \right] \\
+ & = \expect_{Z \sim q_\alpha(z \mid x_n)} \left[ \log \frac{p_\theta(x_n \mid Z) p_\theta(Z)}{q_\alpha(Z \mid x_n)} \right] \\
+ & = \expect_{Z \sim q_\alpha(z \mid x_n)} \left[ \log \, p_\theta(x_n \mid Z) \right] \\
+ & \hspace*{7em} - \dkl(q_\alpha(z \mid x_n) \, \| \, p_\theta(z)).
+\end{align*}
+%
+This form is useful because for certain $p_\theta$ and $q_\alpha$, for
+instance if they are Gaussian, the KL term can be computed exactly
+instead of through sampling, which removes one source of noise in the
+optimization process.
+
\end{document}